Introduction to Problem Banks
Intro duction to Problem Banks
April 11-13 , 202 3 Virtual
@ www.csbs.org � @csbsnews
CONFERENCE OF STATE BANK SUPERVISORS 1 300 I Street NW / Suite 700 / Washington, DC 20 005 / (202) 296-2840
Introduction to Problem Banks Live Virtual April 11 ‐ 13, 2023
Tuesday, April 11, 2023 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Opening and History Perspectives
Break
2:00 pm – 2:15 pm
Red Flags
2:15 pm – 3:00 pm
Open Discussion
3:00 pm – 4:00 pm
Wednesday, April 12, 2023 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Exam Plan and Process
Break
2:00 pm – 2:15 pm
Exam Plan and Process (continued)
2:15 pm – 3:00 pm
Open Discussion
3:0 pm – 4:00 pm
Thursday, April 13, 2023 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm
Enforcement Actions
Break
2:00 pm – 2:15 pm
Enforcement Actions (continued)
2:15 pm – 3:00 pm
Open Discussion
3:00 pm – 4:00 pm
Introduction to Problem Banks Virtual April 11 ‐ 13, 2023
ATTENDEES American Samoa Office of Financial Institutions Langkilde, Teresa
teressa.langkilde@tr.as.gov
Arkansas State Bank Department Lockwood, Aaron
alockwood@banking.state.ar.us rpuloma@banking.state.ar.us
Puloma, Richard
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Ang, Kurt
Kurt.Ang@dfpi.ca.gov
Bautista, George Chen, Michelle Miranda, Angelito Nguyen, Helen Park, Christopher Pineschi, Robert
George.Bautista@dfpi.ca.gov Michelle.Chen@dfpi.ca.gov Angelito.Miranda@dfpi.ca.gov Helen.Nguyen@dfpi.ca.gov Christopher.Park@dfpi.ca.gov Robert.Pineschi@dfpi.ca.gov Denny.Tjie@dfpi.ca.gov Camtu.Tran@dfpi.ca.gov Marisol.vazquez@dfpi.ca.gov
Tjie, Denny Tran, Camtu
Vazquez, Marisol
Wei, Ying
Ying.Wei@dfpi.ca.gov
Indiana Department of Financial Institutions Delaney, Matthew
mdelaney@dfi.in.gov TShearer@dfi.in.gov
Shearer, Tyler
Kansas Office of the State Bank Commissioner Phillips, SaraJane
sarajane.phillips@osbckansas.org
Mississippi Department of Banking & Consumer Finance Strider, Anna
anna.strider@dbcf.ms.gov
Missouri Division of Finance Marshall, Tess
Tess.Marshall@dof.mo.gov Cole.Meyer@dof.mo.gov Eric.Miller@dof.mo.gov
Meyer, Cole Miller, Eric
Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance Kiolbasa, Ben New York State Department of Financial Services Muluk, Robert Utah Department of Financial Institutions Lundgren, Megan Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions Armstrong, Perry Washington Department of Financial Institutions Wu, Sarah Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions Alanis, John Hana, John
benjamin.kiolbasa@nebraska.gov
robert.muluk@dfs.ny.gov
meganlundgren@utah.gov
Perry.Armstrong@scc.virginia.gov John.Hana@scc.virginia.gov
sarah.wu@dfi.wa.gov
john.alanis@dfi.wisconsin.gov
SPEAKERS Arkansas State Bank Department Moseley, Baker
bmoseley@banking.state.ar.us
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Nahnsen ‐ Robinson, Catherine
Catherine.Nahnsen ‐ Robison@dfpi.ca.gov
CSBS STAFF Hoyle, Katie
khoyle@csbs.org
Richardson, Amy
arichardson@csbs.org
Internal Use Only
Defining Problem Banks and History Perspectives When good banks go bad…
Internal Use Only
Zoom Annotation Tool Click View Options at the top then click Annotate.
Click the Text Tool to type your answers.
Internal Use Only
What is a problem bank? Using the annotate tools, type some characteristics below of what makes a bank a problem bank. (View Options > Annotate> Text tool)
Internal Use Only
Definition: • A financial institution with a composite rating of 3, 4, or 5 • A financial institution under an enforcement action • Not to be confused with “Troubled Bank”
Internal Use Only
Two Scenarios Known Problem Bank
Known Non-Problem Bank – Surprise!
Internal Use Only
What’s the difference? Using the annotate feature: • How would you prep for each scenario?
• How would the examination change once you got there?
Internal Use Only
Today’s Landscape: In the chat, describe what you see as either present or looming risks?
Internal Use Only
What we plan to cover in this course:
1. Red Flags 2. Examination Techniques 3. Enforcement Actions
Internal Use Only
Brief History of Crisis and Response
Internal Use Only
The Great Depression • The Banking Act of 1933 • The Security and Exchange Act of 1934 • The Banking Act of 1935
Internal Use Only
The 1980s
• Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 • Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 • Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) of 1991
Internal Use Only
The Great Recession – December 2007
Internal Use Only
Who knows what will come next!
Internal Use Only
The Pandemic Effect
Internal Use Only
What’s next, inflation, recession, ?????
Internal Use Only
Or is it…
Liquidity
Internal Use Only
Questions
Internal Use Only
Problem Bank Training Red Flags
Internal Use Only
Objectives of this section:
Define Red Flags
Sources of information used in Red Flag identification
If seen, some questions to ask.
Internal Use Only
Definition – Red Flags
• Indicators of actual or potential problems or heightened risk
• Can be indicators of root problems (leading indicators) or symptoms/results (lagging indicators).
Internal Use Only
Where do we find red flags? Use the annotate feature to type your answers:
What sources can you use to find red flags?
How do you evaluate or decide which red flags to look at?
Internal Use Only
Poll
Internal Use Only
Whistleblowers – who are they and why do they contact us?
Internal Use Only
Former Management or Directors
Internal Use Only
Objectives: Definition Sources of red flags
Questions to ask
Internal Use Only
Questions to ask Breakout group exercise (20 minutes) In your group: 1. Select a spokesperson 2. Discuss the red flag
3. Come up with questions (at least 3) you would ask management or areas you want to follow-up on. 4. Your group will present their questions to the larger group. 5. Email your list of questions to khoyle@csbs.org.
Internal Use Only
Questions to ask Breakout group exercise Red flag is: • Groups 1 & 4 : Increase in borrowings with the FHLB • Groups 2 & 5: Increase in the level of AOCI (negative) in the bank’s AFS securities. • Groups 3 & 6: Increase in concentration of depositors in one market sector.
Internal Use Only
In conclusion: Definitions Sources for red flags Questions to ask
Internal Use Only
Questions?
Internal Use Only
Problem Bank Training Examination Plan & Process
Internal Use Only
Go to www.menti.com and use the code provided
Internal Use Only
Preparing for Exam
Internal Use Only
Exam Scope
Exam scope should be highly detailed.
Internal Use Only
Identify a Strategy
Internal Use Only
Successful Resolution
ORDER CHAOS
Internal Use Only
Organization
Internal Use Only
In the chat: What are some examples in a word or two that were a challenge for you being an EIC in more of a problem situation?
Internal Use Only
Maintain Documentation
Documentation is key!
Internal Use Only
Gather information
Organized, accurate & complete information.
Internal Use Only
Document Management’s Promises
Generally speaking, avoid personal opinions.
Internal Use Only
Federal Counterparts
Present a united front with federal counterparts.
Internal Use Only
Key Points: • Workpaper procedures • No extra copies • Learn about the bank
• You aren’t alone • CBOs & RBOs
Internal Use Only
Communication
Communication is critical to the exam process.
Internal Use Only
Reporting
Reporting frequency depends on situation.
Internal Use Only
Awareness
Consider regular meetings with examiners.
Internal Use Only
Poll: What is your experience with joint exams? Positive, Negative, or Neutral?
Internal Use Only
Communicate with Bank Management
Bank management should not be hearing about Issues for the first time at the exit meeting.
Internal Use Only
Written Communication
E ‐ mails should be protected through encryption.
Internal Use Only
Confidential Meetings
Internal Use Only
Be Detailed
Detail is important for investigation/prosecution.
Internal Use Only
Documentation • Make copies or scan • Keep organized • Limit to facts • Answer:
• Who • What • Where • When • Why • How
Internal Use Only
Documentation • Include only information about subject bank • Buddy up at meetings • Learn from others & self • Body language & words
• No ultimatums • Keep your cool
Internal Use Only
Education
Focus on requirements – level of compliance/improvement.
Internal Use Only
Enforcement Actions
Be familiar with enforcement actions.
Internal Use Only
Exam Reports and Enforcement Actions
Prioritize recommendations/areas of weakness.
Internal Use Only
Exam Reports and Enforcement Actions
Clearly communicate expectations & timelines.
Internal Use Only
Exam Reports and Enforcement Actions
Obtain & document commitments for corrective action.
Internal Use Only
Exam Reports and Enforcement Actions
Escalate regulatory action when appropriate.
Internal Use Only
Exam Reports and Enforcement Actions
Put in your best effort.
Internal Use Only
Exam Reports and Enforcement Actions
Communicate & compromise where you are able.
Internal Use Only
Factors Influencing Upgrades and Elimination of Enforcement Actions
Sustainability is key.
Internal Use Only
Factors Influencing Upgrades and Elimination of Enforcement Actions
Consider consequences.
Internal Use Only
Factors Influencing Upgrades and Elimination of Enforcement Actions
Terminate action after substantial compliance & sustained performance.
Internal Use Only
Go to www.menti.com and use the code provided
Internal Use Only
Attendee thoughts….
Problem Bank Training Enforcement Actions
Go to www.menti.com and use the code provided
What is an enforcement action?
Why do bank regulators use them?
Types of Enforcement Actions
Informal Enforcement Actions
Formal Enforcement Actions
Poll: Which types of Enforcement Actions have you seen? Formal, Informal, or Both
Typically Joint Actions
Contents of an Enforcement Action
Contents of an Enforcement Action • Identifies parties to the document
Contents of an Enforcement Action • References a specific examination
Contents of an Enforcement Action • Requires signatures of directors
Contents of an Enforcement Action • Sets time frames for initiating change
Contents of an Enforcement Action • Usually requires reports to regulators
Contents of an Enforcement Action
Goal: buy ‐ in and consent to the agreement.
Informal Actions
Focus on issues of risk/regulatory concern.
In the chat: In what areas have you seen management push back?
Board Resolutions (BR)
Board Resolutions (BR) • Most informal option • Initiated by regulator • Based on exam findings • Management crafts • Similar to MOU • Not public
Board Resolutions (BR) • Documented in minutes • Required progress reports
Board Resolutions (BR) • Understand the problems • Capable of correcting • Possess skill sets needed • Willing to act in a timely manner
Board Resolutions (BR) • Can be effective • If breached, the foundation for future actions • In place until Board of
Directors rescinds with regulator concurrence
Poll: Do you think Board Resolutions can be effective? Yes or No
Memorandums of Understanding (MOU)
Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) •Regulators are a party to & craft the document •Developed for banks needing assistance with:
• Weakness identification • Develop corrective action • Set timeframes/prioritize • Reporting progress
Memorandums of Understanding (MOU)
•Not publicly reported by regulators •Bank disclosure? •Issued to state member and non-member banks
Memorandums of Understanding (MOU)
•Typically, joint action •Signed by Regulators & Board •Likely prohibit branching & merger activity
Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) •Challenges with joint documents •Follow-up visits to assess compliance •In place until points addressed,
overall condition is materially better – determined by exam
Poll: Which do you see more often? Board Resolutions or MOUs?
Written Agreements • Formal/public actions • FRB’s preferred method • OCC often uses • Signed by all parties • FDIC rarely uses
Written Agreements • Condition more severe or management willingness in question • Lengthier documents • Required audited financial statements disclosure
Written Agreements • Joint actions • Terminated after compliance • Issued to state member banks, signed by Regulators & Board • Public action
Consent Orders
Consent Orders • Used by states & FDIC, sometimes FRB & OCC • Unsafe/unsound practices and/or violations • Reasonable cause • Issued to state member and non-member banks
Consent Orders • Severe compliance issues • Legal involved in drafting • Legally enforceable • Signed by Regulators & Board
Consent Orders • Exams to determine compliance • Statements of fact addressing each point • Requires bank to immediately stop inappropriate action or implement affirmative action
Consent Order Proceedings
Consent Order Proceedings
•Agency Issues Notice of Charges and of Hearing • Hearing with ALJ – public & similar to bench trial
Consent Order Proceedings •Hearing held in 30-60 days •ALJ decision effective after 30 days • US Circuit Court of Appeals •States have similar procedures
Raise your hand if you have specifically been involved in the development and issuance of any enforcement action?
Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) • Capital key part of decisions • Since FDICIA in 1991 • Framework to preserve value to an acquiring institution
Prompt Corrective Action (PCA)
• Five capital categories • Specific legal ramifications
PCA Ratios – Minimums
PCA Designation
Total Risk Based Capital
Tier 1 Risk Based Capital
Tier 1 Leverage
Well-Capitalized
10%
6% 4%
5% 4%
Adequately Capitalized
8%
Undercapitalized Significantly Undercapitalized
<8% <6%
<4% <3%
<4% <3%
<2% tangible equity to total assets
Critically Undercapitalized
New BASEL III Requirements
Total Risk ‐ Based Capital
Common Equity Tier 1 RBC
Leverage Ratio
Supplementary Leverage Ratio
%
Tier 1 RBC
≥ 10
≥ 8 ≥ 6 < 6 < 4
≥ 6.5 ≥ 4.5 < 4.5
≥ 5 ≥ 4 < 4 < 3
N/A
Well Capitalized
≥ 8 < 8 < 6
≥ 3 < 3
Adequately Capitalized
Undercapitalized
< 3
N/A
Significantly Undercapitalized Critically Undercapitalized
N/A
Tangible Equity (defined as Tier 1 Capital plus non ‐ Tier 1 perpetual Preferred stock) to Total Assets ≤ 2
Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) Capital Categories 1. Well capitalized 2. Adequately capitalized 3. Undercapitalized 4. Significantly undercapitalized 5. Critically undercapitalized
Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) Capital Categories 1. Well capitalized 2. Adequately capitalized 3. Undercapitalized 4. Significantly undercapitalized 5. Critically undercapitalized
PCA - Restrictions
•Regardless of PCA category o No dividends o No management fees o No capital distributions if it moves bank to undercapitalized
Other Enforcement Actions
Revocation of Charters
• Most severe action • Also called closures • COB Fridays
Revocation of Charters • Process begins months prior to closing • Failure date designated • DRR role • Bidding process • No winning bid, a payout bank • Closed by licensing regulator (State or OCC)
What is one thing you have learned from this series that will help you if you encounter a problem bank?
Questions
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator