Cyber & IT Supervisory Forum - Additional Resources

References

Susanne Vernim, Harald Bauer, Erwin Rauch, et al. 2022. A value sensitive design approach for designing AI-based worker assistance systems in manufacturing. Procedia Comput. Sci. 200, C (2022), 505–516. Harini Suresh and John V. Guttag. 2020. A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle. arXiv:1901.10002. Retrieved from Margarita Boyarskaya, Alexandra Olteanu, and Kate Crawford. 2020. Overcoming Failures of Imagination in AI Infused System Development and Deployment. arXiv:2011.13416. Konstantinia Charitoudi and Andrew Blyth. A Socio-Technical Approach to Cyber Risk Management and Impact Assessment. Journal of Information Security 4, 1 (2013), 33 41. Raji, I.D., Smart, A., White, R.N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: defining an end to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Emanuel Moss, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Ranjit Singh, Madeleine Clare Elish, & Jacob Metcalf. 2021. Assemlbing Accountability: Algorithmic Impact Assessment for the Public Interest. Data & Society. Accessed 7/14/2022 Shari Trewin (2018). AI Fairness for People with Disabilities: Point of View. ArXiv, abs/1811.10670. Ada Lovelace Institute. 2022. Algorithmic Impact Assessment: A Case Study in Healthcare. Accessed July 14, 2022. Microsoft Responsible AI Impact Assessment Template. 2022. Accessed July 14, 2022. Microsoft Responsible AI Impact Assessment Guide. 2022. Accessed July 14, 2022. Microsoft Responsible AI Standard, v2. Microsoft Research AI Fairness Checklist. PEAT AI & Disability Inclusion Toolkit – Risks of Bias and Discrimination in AI Hiring Tools.

103